Home Blog Page 76

African Free Expression Organisations to Gather in Accra for Digital Rights Training

Leading freedom of expression organisations from across Africa are meeting in Accra, Ghana, for a two-day capacity building workshop on January 23-24, 2016.

The two-day training is being organised by the African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) with support from the International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX). The event will bring together 18 of the most influential freedom of expression organisations from all regions in Africa in one of the biggest meeting of free expression organisations on the continent.

Under the theme, Empowering Freedom of Expression Organisations in Africa for Effective Digital Rights Advocacy, the training is aimed at enhancing the capacity of participants for effective digital rights advocacy.

As rightly noted by the African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms, “a fundamental challenge in need of urgent resolution in the digital age is how to protect human rights and freedoms on the internet, and the African continent is no exception.”

Africa has witnessed a significant increase in internet penetration and usage. This is contributing to technology/digital-led development on the continent. However, there is evidence of increasing use of surveillance, filtering, blocking, introduction of repressive laws and application of existing ones by some African governments to limit the use of the internet as a tool for free expression.

It is against this background and related rights issues that the workshop is being organized to deepen participants’ knowledge of the issues and develop strategies for online/digital rights advocacy to help create a free, open and safe internet environment that fosters innovation, information sharing and development in their respective countries.

AFEX is a continental network of freedom of expression (FoE) organisations spread across East, West, South and Central Africa who are also members of IFEX. The Media Foundation for West Africa, based in Accra, Ghana, serves as the Secretariat for the network. Other members of the AFEX network are: Media Institute of Southern Africa, Media Rights Agenda, Africa Freedom of Information Centre and Centre for Media Studies and Peacebuilding. The rest are: Journalistes en Danger, National Union of Somali Journalists, West African Journalists Association, and Human Rights Network for Journalists- Uganda.

For more information about AFEX, contact Dora B. Mawutor at dora[@]mfwa.org or write to AFEX email address, info[@]africafex.org, or visit the AFEX website at www.africafex.org.

Ghana: Police, Government Official Disrupt TV Programme

A Municipal Chief Executive (MCE) in the Brong Ahafo Region of Ghana has disrupted a live outdoor television programme by Amansan Television (ATV) on January 8, 2016.

Gordon Kwaku Asubonteng, MCE for Dormaa, with the help of the Municipal Police Commander, Superintendent Washington Foli and Assistant Superintendent of Police Samuel K. Yeboah, ordered the broadcast to be ceased citing a breach of Ghana’s Public Order Act.

The programme, Asem Yi Di Ka, was organised by ATV to offer an opportunity to the public to vent their grievances about the fraudulent activities of micro finance institutions in the area (and many communities in the Brong Ahafo Region), to which many have fallen victim leading to violent protests in the region.

Reports said 45 minutes into the outdoor transmission, the MCE,  Asubonteng and his police escorts including Superintendent Foli , stormed the venue to stop the programme. They claimed that the TV station had not obtained the necessary permit for such a public event.

The MCE was also quoted as saying that the programme was “inciting the people against President John Mahama’s government, making his administration very unpopular”

The disruption of the programme drew angry protests from the crowd and the TV crew.  The Producer of the Programme, Nana Tufour, told the Ghana News Agency that he was shocked at the MCE’s action, having invited him to the programme “because we had invited some representatives of other political parties.”

Asubonteng confirmed that the producer had called him but that he ordered the stoppage of the programme because it was against the Public Order Act to assemble a teeming crowd of disgruntled people.

The Municipal Police Commander described the television programme as “politically motivated.”

While the previous incident that saw angry victims of micro credit fraud recently attacking a radio station in the region may justify the concerns of the authorities, they could still have allowed the programme to proceed under police security, rather than disrupt it at the risk of violent reaction from the crowd.

Adopt Rights-Based Internet Policies in West Africa – MFWA

The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) has urged policy makers in West Africa to adopt internet policies and regulations that respect established human rights norms and principles to create an enabling environment for the creation, use and dissemination of information on the internet.

The call was made following the publication of findings from monitoring of internet rights violations and other developments in West Africa.

The findings show that while some governments in the region are introducing new policies and laws to regulate internet use in their countries, others are already applying existing laws to control online expression. Specifically, the findings show that existing libel and defamation laws have been used against some individuals for content they published on Facebook and/or WhatsApp.

The MFWA is therefore calling on governments and regulatory bodies in the region to be mindful of their duty to protect and safeguard the fundamental rights and freedoms of their citizens – including freedom of expression rights– in their policy and regulatory interventions. The MFWA recommends a multistakeholder approach to such interventions to ensure that the concerns of all stakeholders in the internet ecosystem in the respective countries are factored into policy formulation.

The monitoring and reporting of online violations and other developments in West Africa is an initiative by the MFWA with funding support from UK-based Global Partners Digital. The exercise is aimed at generating evidence-based reports on the online environment in the respective countries in the region which can be used as reference materials and advocacy tools by other human rights defenders and online activists.

The full Internet Rights Monitoring in West Africa report for April-September 2015 can be accessed here.

Ghana: Rampaging Mob Threaten To Kill Media Personnel, Force The Closure Of FM Station

The police have closed down Jerryson FM in the Brong Ahafo region of Ghana after hundreds of angry people armed with cutlasses stormed the premises of the radio station to demand monies invested in a venture set up by the owner of the station.

The mob kidnapped the son of the Head of Sports at the station, according reports by Accra-based radio station, Joy FM.

The reports said on January 5, 2016, the mob also threatened to kill staff of the station if the Director failed to comply with their demands.  Jarstar Motors and Investments, which is owned by the Director of the radio station, took deposits from clients promising to give out a car after they have made full payment of the price of the car.

Later, the company ventured into a scheme, promising to give 50% interest on monies invested for two months. Suspecting an attempt to defraud them, the clients decided to vent their spleen on innocent media personnel at Jerryson FM, which is also owned by the founder of Jarstar Motors and Investments.

The MFWA strongly condemns the unwarranted attack on innocent staff of Jerryson FM. We call for the immediate release of the kidnapped child of the Head of Sports, and urge the police to arrest and prosecute the perpetrators of the wanton act of violence. More importantly, we call on the authorities to reopen the station immediately and to protect lives and property on the premises.

Mali: Radio Presenter Killed

 A radio presenter in Tombouctou, Mali was shot dead late in the night of December 17, 2015 by an unidentified gunman.

Joel Dicko was killed shortly after he had closed his programme and was conversing with his friends in front of  a shop about 20 metres from Radio Tahint, where he worked. Two of his companions also died in the attack while the rest were lucky to escape. The Kalashnikov-wielding attacker could not be identified because he was hooded with a turban and shaded by the darkness.

Radio Tahint is a Christian station and was opened in the wake of the 2012 insurgency in Northern Mali to propagate peace and reconciliation, and Dicko is said to have symbolised those ideals. While many believe the attacker could have been an insurgent, the motive behind the attack is, unclear.  The police are said to be investigating the incident.

The correspondent said Radio Tahint suspended transmission for three days to mourn the loss. On December 18, all other stations in Tombouctou also suspended transmissions in solidarity.

The media in Mali issued a statement condemning the attack as cowardly and called on the authorities to track down the killer.

The MFWA is greatly disturbed by this incident and joins the Malian media in calling on the security agencies in the country to do everything possible to apprehend the killer and bring him to book.

West Africa: Critical Journalism under Siege

Across West Africa, critical journalists have had to face parliamentary and judicial enquiries, arbitrary arrests and detentions in recent times. In what appears to be an emerging pattern of attempts at censorship and restrictions on critical reporting, journalists in various countries have had to face questioning by authorities for their reports.

Since the beginning of 2015, 23 journalists from different countries in the region have been summoned or arrested and questioned by state institutions or regulatory bodies.

The most recent incident occurred in Guinea Bissau and Sierra Leone on December 4th 2015. In the first incident, the Attorney General of Guinea Bissau, António Sedja Man ordered the cancellation of a scheduled popular programme on a state-owned radio station and summoned the Director General of the state broadcaster to the Ministry of Justice for what he called “a working meeting.”

A subpoena dated December 4, signed by the Attorney General, summoned Francisco Muniro Conte and called off the programme which is popular for its frank discussion of topical national issues. However, strong protests from media organisations in the country saved the journalist from further harassment.

On the same day, the Clerk of Parliament in Sierra Leone summoned three journalists to appear before Parliament to answer questions. Thomas Dixon and Theo Harding, Managing Editor and Editor of Salone Times, respectively, and Asma James, Station Manager of Radio Democracy, were asked to appear and clarify a claim they made on the December 3 edition of a radio programme called “Good Morning Salone.” The programme was broadcast on local radio station Radio Democracy. The said claim concerned the travelling budget of the Minister of Information and Communications, Alhaji Alpha Kanu.

Earlier on  September 10, the the Clerk of Parliament had  summoned Abdul Karim Fonti Kabia and Bampia J. Bundu, Publisher and Managing Editor, respectively of Blade newspaper regarding a satirical article they published on September 1, titled: “SHAMEFULL: Rubber Stamp Parliament.”

The Independent Media Commission (IMC) is the constitutionally-mandated body in charge of resolving media disputes and sanctioning unprofessional media conduct in Sierra Leone. However, the country’s Parliament appears to be assuming the mandate of the IMC in a manner that many fear may result in intimidating the media.

“We believe that if Parliament wants to clarify any broadcast or publication, they should go through the Independent Media Commission (IMC) as part of strengthening state institutions,” said Amadu Lamrana Bah, President of the Sierra Leone Reporters Union (SLRU).

In Niger, two journalists, Zabeirou Souley, Editor in Chief of Le Nouveau Républicain, and Roufai Dan Doua, Editor in Chief of 90 Minutes, were arrested on November 4, and questioned by the police following a defamation complaint by the president of the Niger Football Federation. Souley and Doua were released after being detained and questioned for several hours.

Earlier, Garba Lompo, the Managing Editor of Canard Déchainé, Oumarou Aliou Modibo, was summoned and questioned at the office of the Public Prosecutor at the Niamey County Court. The questioning followed a March 16 publication of an article on the illegal acquisition of land by the Nigerien Minister of Justice.  The editor was later put into custody overnight.

Then comes Cote d’Ivoire where on October 30, Koffi Kouassi Norbert, who writes under the pen name Norbert N’Kaka, was summoned by Sessi Soukou, the Deputy Mayor of Dabou, a town in southern Côte d’Ivoire. Soukou summoned Kouassi to explain his articles about the town that the Deputy Mayor considered unfair. While N’Kaka was with the Deputy Mayor responding to questions about his articles, some youth in the town attacked his home.

Prior to the October 30 incident, Joseph Gnahoua Titi and Séverine Blé, Managing Editor and Editor in Chief of Aujourd’hui newspaper, were on July 28, summoned by investigative department of the country’s Gendarmerie to explain a July 21 publication about the wealth of Ivorian President Alassanne Ouattara. The said publication was titled, “President Ouattara is extremely rich. His wealth is estimated at 17 billion US dollars.” The two journalists were questioned for nearly five hours by the Gendarmerie.

In Senegal, On August 28, Mamadou Wane, Managing Editor of Enquête newspaper, was summoned to appear before an investigating magistrate. Wane was summoned and accused of “illegally publishing judicial proceedings before public hearing.” When he appeared, he was charged and put on probation the entire day.  His passport was also seized.

Still in Senegal, three journalists —Mohamed Gueye, Alioune Badara Fall and Mamadou Wane—were summoned by the police on July 14. Prior to this, Gueye had been summoned twice by the police regarding a publication on a counterfeiting case involving a musician named Thione Seck. The three journalists were later detained.

On July 1, the dreaded National Intelligent Agency (NIA) of The Gambia, summoned and interrogated five journalists of The Voice newspaper. The NIA questioned Musa S. Sheriff, Sulayman Ceesay, Bakary Ceesay, Amadou Bah and Mafugi Ceesay and demanded personal information. The NIA requested information about the newspaper’s sources of revenue, how it obtains reports, its aims and objectives, what it stands for and the kind of information the journalists cover.

Ghana is not an exception. On June 29, Kojo Yankson, morning show host of Accra-based Joy FM, was summoned by the Privileges Committee of the country’s Parliament. Yankson was summoned along with Professor Alex Dodoo, an academic and clinical scientist. This followed an interview Prof. Dodoo granted Yankson, in which Prof. Dodoo said MPs were ignorant about Ebola vaccine trials.

In Guinea, Diallo Souleymane, the General Manager of Lynx newspaper  was summoned on March 25 and 26, and questioned by Martine Condé, the president of Guinea’s media regulatory body, Haute Autorité de la Communication (HAC-High Communications Authority). This followed an article Souleymane wrote on the then-newly constituted HAC. The article, which was published in the March 16 edition of Lynx, condemned a violation of Article 7 of the law on the HAC stipulating that “the President of the HAC shall be elected by his peers under the supervision of the Constitutional Court.” In the case in point, however, the new president and members of the HAC took an oath before a bailiff instead.

The MFWA believes that even though perceived acts of unprofessionalism must be checked, constitutionally-mandated independent institutions, especially media regulatory bodies, must be the institution to issue reprimand and sanctions. Even in that case, the regulatory body must be tactful when resolving these matters so that journalists feel safe to question state officials and institutions and the media is not forced into self-censorship.

Summons of media personnel by the executive, the police and other state security agencies are unwarranted and intimidating. For democracy and good governance to thrive, journalists and the media must be able to report on all issues without harassment and intimidation in order to demand accountability on behalf of the citizenry.

ECOWAS Must Not Fail The Gambia

The MFWA has learnt with great excitement and anticipation reports that three exiled Gambian journalists have filed a legal claim at the ECOWAS Court of Justice. The claim, which was jointly filed with the Federation of African Journalists on December 7, 2015, is to challenge the repressive laws, attacks and systematic violations against journalists in The Gambia.

According to the Media Legal Defence Initiative (MLDI), which is supporting the journalists in their suit, the journalists are challenging laws “which have their roots in colonial times when they were used to suppress dissent, but are now specifically used to target journalists and human rights defenders.”

“The applicants have asked the Court to make a declaration that their very existence violates the right to freedom of expression,” the MLDI statement said. “In addition, some of the applicants argue that they suffered torture as a consequence of them exercising their right to freedom of expression.”

Under President Jammeh’s 21 year rule, several journalists, human rights defenders and ordinary citizens have suffered arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, intimidation etc. Many of these people have been forced to flee to the United States and neighbouring Senegal. President Jammeh’s security apparatus, the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) work in total impunity. Dissent is ruthlessly repressed and journalists live and work in fear.

The Gambia is the country with the highest and severest cases of impunity in West Africa. At the time of writing this piece, a radio station manager, Alhagie Abdoulie Ceesay, has spent 153 days in detention for distributing, to two protocol officers of President Jammeh– Fatou A. Drammeh and Zainab Koneh– photos of the president with a gun pointed at him. He was arrested and detained by the NIA on July 17, 2015. He was first arraigned before the Banjul Magistrates’ court on August 4, and charged with a single count charge of “inciting hatred and discontent against the president.” He was later arraigned before a High Court with additional seven counts charges pressed against him. Ceesay has been denied bail three times.

While the MFWA welcomes the latest legal challenge to the state of impunity in The Gambia, we also recall the previous judgements by the ECOWAS Court that The Gambia has failed to comply with. The Gambia under Yahya Jammeh has failed to comply with three judgements against it for the disappearance of Ebrima Manneh, the arrest, detention and torture of Musa Saidykhan, and the murder of Deyda Hydara.

Manneh’s judgement was given on June 2008. The ECOWAS Community Court ordered the government of President Jammeh to release Ebrima Manneh, a journalist who has been missing since July 2006, and pay his family damages of US$100,000. Unfortunately, Manneh’s whereabouts remain unknown and the Gambian government has not paid the mandated compensation.

In 2010, ECOWAS also ordered The Gambia to pay Musa Saidykhan– who is currently on exile in the United States of America– US$200,000 in compensatory damages. The country is yet to comply.

In the case of Deyda Hydara, the ECOWAS Court ruled in June 2014 that The Gambia did not conduct a proper investigation into the murder of the journalist and allowed a climate of impunity to thrive. Furthermore, the Court found that “such impunity has the effect of denying journalists the right to operate effectively, thus stifling freedom of expression.” Thus, The Gambia has not satisfied its duty “to ensure respect for the rights of journalists” as directed by Article 66 of the ECOWAS Treaty. The Court awarded $50,000 in damages to Hydara’s family.

While the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice in itself cannot compel governments and individuals to comply with the judgements, ECOWAS has the power to impose sanctions on The Gambia for non-compliance with the judgements. In the ECOWAS Treaty, countries which breach Article 66 are liable for sanctions. ECOWAS has, however, not initiated any processes to sanction The Gambia.

The MFWA is hopeful that the journalists will be successful in their suit. We also hope that when the ECOWAS Court rules against The Gambia, the country will comply this time round. If the country disregards the decision of the Court once again, ECOWAS must step in and ensure compliance through sanctions. The least ECOWAS can do is suspend The Gambia from its activities until the country abides by the judgments of the ECOWAS Court. Gambian journalists, human rights defenders and citizens are looking up to ECOWAS to call President Jammeh to order and ensure that freedom of expression and human rights conditions improve in The Gambia, and ECOWAS must not fail them!

400 Ghanaian Youth Empowered With Digital Entrepreneurship Skills

0

Over 400 Ghanaian youth have been empowered with digital entrepreneurship ideas and skills that will help them create jobs for themselves and develop careers in the ICTs sector.

The participants who were drawn from the Greater Accra, Upper West and Western Regions received training on various topics including career opportunities in the ICTs sector, how to start-up an ICT business and also, how to develop business proposals and access start-up capitals at training workshops organised under the ICT Coaching and Mentoring Fair events.

The ICT Coaching and Mentoring Fairs were organised by the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), in partnership with UK-based Global Partners Digital (GPD) and MTN Ghana under the MFWA’s Internet Freedom Programme from September to October 2015.

Some of the participants shared their impressions about the programme:

Rexford Panful, a participant at the Takoradi workshop said, “This has been my best mentoring session ever. It’s been a wonderful seminar. Thanks and keep it up.”

 “I’m going to collaborate with like-minded colleagues to start right away. It is a good programme and it should be replicated” Nurideen Musah, a participant at the Wa workshop indicated.

“About to start blogging …. In fact, this programme is an eye-opener; it must be conducted every two months. And I recommend that it should be held in schools, churches and youth organisations everywhere to empower we the youth,” Priscilla A. Apadu, a participant at the Accra workshop said.

The ICT Coaching and Mentoring Fairs form part of the MFWA’s Digital Youth Empowerment Project which is aimed at enhancing the understanding of the youth in internet freedom issues and Internet Governance processes. It also seeks to motivate, network, mentor and provide a platform for the youth to take advantage of the growing ICTs sector to empower themselves economically.

MFWA Salutes Human Rights Advocates

0

As the world observes Human Rights Day today, December 10, 2015, the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) salutes all individuals and organisations, especially journalists and the media, whose untiring efforts have kept human rights issues in constant focus at national, regional and international levels.

These efforts have led to the increasing realisation that human rights and socio-economic development are mutually reinforcing. Indeed, it is no accident that the world’s most advanced economies, where living standards are highest, are among the leading democracies founded on the protection and promotion of human rights and characterised by a vibrant, pluralistic media.

The world has come a long way in ensuring that basic human rights are guaranteed to all without regard to race, gender, religion, physical disability or any other distinction. Ranging from the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) in 1966; the ratification of other international human rights treaties on torture, enforced disappearances, racial discrimination, discrimination against women, children’s rights, rights of persons with disabilities, migrant workers; the creation of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 1993; to the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the world has made giant strides in advancing human rights.

Nevertheless, the implementation of human rights obligations is lagging. Most treaties, though ratified and binding, often remain paper tigers and lack teeth. This is especially the case in developing countries and under autocratic regimes that are intolerant of divergent opinions. Unfortunately, many such regimes exist, not just in Africa, but across the world, as in Burma, Syria and the Gulf States, for example. Pervasive human rights problems also persist in Africa, as in Sudan, Somalia, Uganda and under West Africa’s King of Impunity in The Gambia.

In the aforementioned countries, political freedoms are severely curtailed. Needless to say, freedom of expression is a precious commodity enjoyed by a privileged and powerful few in those parts of the world. Censorship, criminal libel and internet surveillance as well as threats and physical attacks are used to suppress criticism and thus harm the enjoyment of human rights more broadly. Restrictions on expression result in a frustrated population with limited opportunities for achieving decent, dignified and fulfilling lives. With such a suppressed human capital, social and economic progress is invariably hampered.

In light of this, all countries must facilitate the work of human rights-based civil society organisations and provide adequate resources to enable the effective functioning of national human rights institutions. Governments must respect and protect the fundamental right to freedom of expression to empower their citizens to contribute to national development and, ultimately, to build a world where human rights and human dignity are inviolable.

Guinea Bissau: Attorney General suspends radio programme, summons Director of state broadcaster

The Attorney General of Guinea Bissau has ordered the cancellation of a scheduled popular radio programme and summoned the Director General of the state broadcaster Radio Guinée Bissau (RGB) to appear at the Ministry of Justice for “a working meeting”  on December 8, 2015.

A subpoena dated on December 4, signed by the Attorney General, António Sedja Man, summoned Francisco Muniro Conte and called off the programme at the same time.

According to the MFWA correspondent, the aborted programme is a weekly platform which discusses important issues affecting the country.

The correspondent reported that there was angry reaction to the incident. The president of the Journalists’ Union of Guinea-Bissau, Mamadu Cande strongly condemned the decision and warned that both internal and external mechanisms will be employed to resist the “attempt to silence an organ of information ”.

The media regulatory body in the country, the National Council for Social Communication (Conseil National de la Communication Sociale (CNCS), also condemned the Attorney General’s action, adding that he “has no right to suspend any media programme”.

The MFWA joins the media in Guinea Bissau to condemn this act of interference in the work of the media and harrasment of a media professional. We call on the authorities in the country to ensure that Muniro Conte’s freedoms are not violated by the Attorney General of of the Republic.

MFWA, DW Akadamie Boost Investigative Reporting in Ghana 

The Media foundation for West Africa (MFWA), in partnership with DW Akademie, is organising a Coaching and Mentoring workshop on investigative journalism for 30 selected journalists across Ghana.
The initiative, which is under the MFWA’s “Journalism for Change” (J4C) project, is targeted at journalists who have demonstrated potential for investigative reporting and commitment to ensuring positive changes in society through their investigative work.
The objective is to inspire them and enhance their knowledge and skills for effective investigative reporting. It is also to afford participants the opportunity to network and build synergies for more effective and impactful investigative reporting.
The Investigative Journalism workshop will be held in Accra on 2-3 December, 2015 and in Kumasi on 7-8 December, 2015. They will feature sessions such as the Concept of Investigative Journalism and Importance of Data; the Art and Skill of Conducting Effective Interviews for an Impactful Investigative work and How to Empower Citizens to Access Information and hold duty bearers accountable.
Resource persons for the workshop include Mrs. Elizabeth Ohene, Seasoned journalist with experience in Ghana and the BBC World Service, London; Mr. Kwaku Sakyi-Addo, one time correspondent for both BBC and Reuters and host of several award-winning current affairs programmes on radio and television, Manasseh Azure Awuni, Broadcast Journalist and Ms. Evelyn Groenink, founder of the Forum for African Investigative Reporters, South Africa.
“The ultimate objective of our Journalism for Change Project is to inspire high quality journalism that does not only contribute to accountable governance in Ghana but also promotes citizens’ access to information,” said Abigail Larbi-Odei, Programme Officer for Media, Democracy and Development at the MFWA.
She added that, the MFWA seeks to groom and inspire young, committed journalists to pursue global standards in investigative journalism. “Going forward, we are constituting a high level Journalism for Change Network where members will be supported to produce impact-making stories and also capacitated to support advocacy on citizens’ right to access information”. She further noted.

Mauritania Rejects Recommendations to Protect Freedom of Expression, Journalists, and Human Rights Defenders

At a recent U.N.-level human rights review, Mauritania rejected recommendations by Member States on protecting the right to freedom of expression and creating an enabling environment, especially for journalists and human rights defenders.

Prior to Mauritania’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the U.N. Human Rights Council’s periodic review of Member States, the MFWA and other organisations submitted information and recommendations to be taken into consideration during the review. The information and recommendations by the MFWA were cited nine times by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in OHCHR’s submission to the UPR process.

During the UPR, Mauritania accepted and rejected several human rights recommendations by Member States, some of which concerned free expression rights and issues. Of those, Mauritania accepted recommendations to end impunity for police and security forces’ excessive use of force; raise awareness about human rights; and increase anti-slavery campaigns. However, Mauritania rejected Belgium’s recommendation to explicitly “protect effectively freedom of expression of civil society, in particular for journalists and human rights defenders, so that they can carry out their activities freely without hindrance, intimidation, harassment, or risk of condemnation.”

The UPR of Mauritania took place on 3 November 2015. The MFWA’s factsheet, Freedom of Expression in Mauritania- Outcome of 2015 U.N. Human Rights Review summarizes the outcome of the UPR and includes recommendations for advocacy interventions to improve the situation of freedom of expression in Mauritania.